Original Art Stories: The Mystery Of Jack Kirby's Art Ghost
The second, and final,
volume of Greg Theakston’s excellent Jack Kirby biography, Jack Magic Vol II,
is now out and, as with Volume I it’s a cracking read and worth every
cent - if you're even remotely serious about comic book history then you need both volumes of this book. It’s doubtful that a biography of
Kirby will be released in the future that will surpass this one for sheer
entertainment value and insights, although I expect that many will try. There might be more detailed biographies and
studies to come, but Theakston's work will always sit at the head of the table, and with Jack
Kirby to be featured in a major Hollywood movie, titled Argo, written by George Clooney, directed by Ben Affleck and slated for release in 2012,
the time is certainly ripe for a major push for Marvel to finally start
crediting Kirby with the co-creation, if not outright creation, of those
seminal characters, along with some more tangible rewards for his family.
![]() |
Sotheby's June 15, 1994 Catalogue |
Reading the final
volume of Jack Magic I was stunned to come across information relating to the
cover recreations that Kirby penciled back in the early 1990s. In short, Marvel gave Kirby, Dick Ayers and John Romita permission to
pencil recreations of some of their most famous, and iconic, Marvel covers for
sale at auction. The idea was that the artists would receive all of the profits. In Kirby's case if the
covers were inked, as some were by Dick Ayers, then the profits would be split
between Kirby and the inker. As maligned
as Marvel is, it was a kind gesture from the publisher and a way for Kirby to
raise some serious money for his wife, Roz Kirby, and family as his health was failing rapidly. The story is that Kirby duly set to work in the latter part of 1993 and penciled a series
of covers which were then sold at auction at Sotheby’s in June 1994 , with the result being that the Kirby family realised a five figure sum. Granted it was a pittance compared to what
Marvel really owed Kirby, but, on the flip-side, they did allow the recreations
to be sanctioned without a license fee.
It was the very least that Marvel could do. Where the story is a bit strange is that, if we believe the official version, Kirby reportedly drew the pieces only months
before he passed away. In that time, we
are led to believe, Kirby was in failing health, yet managed to produce
high quality pencil drawings. More on
that shortly.
The recreated items of
art sold for high prices, indeed some of the highest amounts
that Kirby art had gone for to that point. This was
due to a number of factors, first a foremost being that these covers were
amongst the first Marvel cover recreations that Kirby had done, second was the
covers were official, third that some of the covers were inked by Ayers. For Marvel collectors, who had long given up
on the idea of seeing, let alone owning, the original art to covers such as
Amazing Fantasy #15, or Fantastic Four #1, a recreation by the original
penciler was the next best thing.
However there was one factor that collectors and the purchasers of the
art didn’t know at the time, and that was some of the art, sold as being pure
Kirby, was actually ghosted. As Greg
Theakston recounts;
During the last two years of his life, the
family began to offer re-creations of some of Jack’s most famous covers. Kirby
had quit drawing a few years before and if he couldn’t sign his name without
some tremor he certainly couldn’t transcribe a Comics Code stamp. A ghost
artist was enlisted to produce the work, some of which was inked by Kirby’s long-time
associate Dick Ayers. Even if Kirby could, he wouldn’t want to do cover
recreation because he hated doing anything twice, much less covers the first
time.
The June 18, 1994, some four months after his
death, Sotheby’s Auction House featured the following recreations, some by
Kirby’s ghost only, some by Kirby’s ghost and Ayers.
KIRBY ONLY
AMAZING FANTASY #15 ($10,925)
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #1 ($14,950)-
TALES OF SUSPENSE #39 ($7,475)
KIRBY/AYERS
FANTASTIC FOUR #1 ($7,475)-
FANTASTIC FOUR #5 ($6,325)
X-MEN #1 ($4,887)
JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY #83 ($9,200)
STRANGE TALES #89 ($5,750)
For those of you without a calculator, that’s
just under $68,000, less what the ghost artist and Dick Ayers were paid. A handful off private commissions from the
same period included:
STRANGE TALES ANNUAL #2
FANTASTIC FOUR #48, #49, #50, #72
AVENGERS #1
HULK #2
At an average of $6,000 per cover, the figure
jumps to about $89,000, or about three years worth of work at Marvel. Now, it
may seem unethical to pull such a fast one but it was all being done to help
support Roz. Jack’s earning days were over and if all he had left was the
selling power of his name, so be it. And the guy knew the end was near. Hell,
for a woman about to become a widow? My surrogate mother about to be a widow?
If they’d asked me, I’d have done re-creations for them and not given the
ethics a second thought[1].
I don’t doubt Greg Theakston’s account for a few
reasons. He was there at the time, which
is more than a lot of people can say, and as he was acting as Kirby’s art
dealer and agent, he would have been privy to information that others outside
of his family wouldn’t have been. This
leaves us with a few options, either Kirby drew the recreations alone, he had
help, or a ‘ghost’ artist penciled the covers with either minimal or no input
or assistance from Kirby. Naturally this
information wasn’t disclosed at the time of the Sotheby’s auctions, nor did
Mark Evanier disclose this information in his subsequent POV column in The Comic Buyers Guide about the recreations. But if Kirby didn’t draw the art, then who
did? I’ve been led to believe that none
other than Mike Royer was the Kirby ghost, but that has yet to be confirmed,
what is also known is that latter day Kirby inker Mike Thibodeaux both penciled
and inked the titles and mastheads on some of the covers. Certainly the infamous ‘work in progress’
photos, which shows Kirby at the drawing board supposedly drawing the recreated
Amazing Fantasy #15 cover, offers up no concrete conclusions as the art appears
to be fully finished in both shots, so it could be that Kirby merely sat down
at the board with the cover in front of him.
It’s also worth keeping in mind that the cover was finished a mere two
months before Kirby’s death, and here lies some more damning evidence.
![]() |
Jack Kirby posing with the cover shown below |
If you look art that Kirby produced professionally towards
the end of his life it’s clear that a pattern of deterioration developed. The art in his final few fully pencilled books
wasn’t the usual high Kirby quality; in its original pencil form its generally shaky
and not clearly defined. It’s well known
that a lot of his later art was ‘fixed’ in the inks by the likes of Royer, D.
Bruce Berry, Thibodeaux and Theakston himself, and that Kirby had pretty much
finished drawing in the early 1990s. The
idea that Kirby, in failing health, could produce such detailed, high quality
pencil recreations is a bit of a stretch, but such was the emotive quality of
the art that people were willing to suspend disbelief in order to gain a
bargain. But what of those who now own
the recreations? What, if any, recourse
do they have?
It’s doubtful that Dick Ayers knew that the covers had
been ghosted, and there’s no suggestion that Ayers did anything other than ink
the art put before him, as he was asked, and paid, to. However it’s highly possible that Sotheby’s was
aware of the ghosting, but ignored it, certainly the descriptions and write up
in the art catalogue make no mention of the art being anything but genuine. Art
dealer Mike Burkey sold the Amazing Fantasy #15 recreation for a price around
the $70,000-$80,000 mark in recent times, certainly Mike wasn’t aware that the
art had been either fully or partially ghosted by another artist when he bought
the art or when he sold it. If Sotheby’s
were aware of the ghosting at the time of the sale then it’s possible that they
would have put it down to a standard practice, that being that Kirby, similar
to artists in the fine art world, regularly employed ghosts to produce work
under his name and in his style. He
wouldn’t have been the first artist to do so, indeed he wouldn’t have been the
first comic book artist to sign high end art for auction that he didn’t produce
– it’s common knowledge that a lot of the Bob Kane ‘paintings’ and other
images, such as lithographs that he sold at auction towards the end of his life
were ghosted by others; legend has it that one artist brought legal action
against Kane for his failure to promptly pay for the work. The practice of using ghost artists to
produce work under the supervision, or approval, of an artist isn’t illegal per
se, but the selling of that art, without clear and proper attribution is
somewhat unethical. In the case of the Kirby
recreations they were sold with certificates of authenticity signed by Roz
Kirby and representatives of both Marvel and Sotheby’s. Certainly those who paid the price then, and
have paid higher prices since 1994, could have a valid complaint, and the
accusation that the art, in all likeliness, wasn’t produced by Jack Kirby,
means its overall value will diminish considerably. After all it’s one thing to believe that you own the last ever
full pencil piece by Jack Kirby only to find out that he probably didn’t draw it.
![]() |
The COA that came with the Amazing Fantasy #15 cover |
![]() |
The main page detailing the recreations from the Sotheby's catalogue |
[1] Jack
Magic Vol II; Greg Theakston, Pure Imagination 2011
Comments
Glad you liked the Kirby book! I was very impressed with it, too!
It's just one more indication of how comic book for many people aren't about art, and artists, but rather about so called "iconic images," famous covers, and big name characters.
Justin
What you need to remember here is that Jack Kirby was an incredibly talented and creative visionary, but he was also a man, with his own set of failings, as everyone has. However if Kirby did not do those recreations, yet signed them, then those who bought them in good faith certainly have reason to feel aggrieved. You might be happy with it, but I'm sure that those who paid prices in the tens of thousands aren't.
And they set Dali on fire? Amazing! What other factoids do you have on hand pally?
http://www.bleedingcool.com/forums/showthread.php?48299-Greg-Theakston-Sothebys-\
And-The-Great-Jack-Kirby-Scam&p=252313#post252313
Either way, it's ugly.
Best,
Mike
http://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/dynamics/2011/10/23/re-shame-on-you-danny-boy/
cheers,
- Rob Steibel
http://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/dynamics/2011/10/23/from-mike-royer/
R-