tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post8622025126169178347..comments2024-02-26T14:01:07.682+10:30Comments on 20th Century Danny Boy: "Not Inherently Notable"Daniel Besthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10709668308904142615noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post-57940605671784210162009-01-30T18:24:00.000+10:302009-01-30T18:24:00.000+10:30from *cough*cough* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...from *cough*cough* <B> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Independent_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings </B><BR/><BR/>Remeber What Lunokhod said, do we need a independent evidence for everything that ever happened? Like Independent evidence for 9/11 or Independent evidence for the American Revolution. Branson03 20:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)steviehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01150940530404428216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post-12497679250959061672009-01-28T06:38:00.000+10:302009-01-28T06:38:00.000+10:30I'll ask because I don't know - where and what is ...I'll ask because I don't know - where and what is Knol? Is it a grassy place from which to fire guns?Daniel Besthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10709668308904142615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post-9352720581564345282009-01-28T00:59:00.000+10:302009-01-28T00:59:00.000+10:30Why not add your article to Knol? If Wikipedians ...Why not add your article to Knol? If Wikipedians don't want it, there's no point forcing it upon them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post-56078083764438950042009-01-27T13:54:00.000+10:302009-01-27T13:54:00.000+10:30Forget it, Jake. It's Wikipedia.Forget it, Jake. It's Wikipedia.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post-56985383598211973722009-01-26T03:52:00.000+10:302009-01-26T03:52:00.000+10:30I do not use Wikipedia or the IMDB as factual sour...I do not use Wikipedia or the IMDB as factual sources for anything for the same reason as John Byrne. The use websirtes as sources and are full of misinformation. <BR/><BR/>I would not fret, they seem to be from people that have no idea what fact is from fiction. So hyping a site such as the comic database would be better. I do not know anyone that sites Wikipedia on anything that is relevant Jimmy Thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16305987448594545054noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post-59751857448118067962009-01-25T20:26:00.000+10:302009-01-25T20:26:00.000+10:30Is that so, oh Anon one? Does the person who is n...Is that so, oh Anon one? Does the person who is not afraid to sign their name to their work have issues, or the one who takes pot shots and is far too cowardly to sign their name. I'd say, dear chum, that you have issues that you need to embrace and deal with.<BR/><BR/>Hooroo little coward...hooroo!Daniel Besthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10709668308904142615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post-46741852666810579962009-01-25T18:16:00.000+10:302009-01-25T18:16:00.000+10:30Talk about sour grapes...you do seem to have some ...Talk about sour grapes...you do seem to have some issues.<BR/><BR/>cheers<BR/>BSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post-9965342685952577282009-01-25T11:57:00.000+10:302009-01-25T11:57:00.000+10:30In other words go there and adopt a 'Yes Massa, No...In other words go there and adopt a 'Yes Massa, No Massa' attitude to beg forgiveness to a person who arbitrarily removes entries without reading them?<BR/><BR/>There is no conflict of interest here - clearly you don't understand the meaning of the phrase. I am not Dave Simons. I am not trying to sell Dave, nor his products. I am not trying to profit from my work about Dave. I am attempting Daniel Besthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10709668308904142615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post-32827881354935465662009-01-25T09:00:00.000+10:302009-01-25T09:00:00.000+10:30Daniel, there's two problems with your entry. Not...Daniel, there's two problems with your entry. Notability, per se, believe it or not, is not <I>directly</I> one of them. First, in order for an article to exist on Wikipedia, its subject must be covered in sources considered reliable by that website's criteria, and that disallows blogs, writings on the subject's own site, and things like interviews carried out by the author of the article. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6123927.post-85637177939688657202009-01-24T21:26:00.000+10:302009-01-24T21:26:00.000+10:30Shaking head in disbelief'`'`'`'`'`Shaking head in disbelief'`'`'`'`'`Satima Flavellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17427849961195148899noreply@blogger.com