Share It

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Jack Kirby 1975: "I love the fans - even if some of them are Nazis."

Old convention programmes are virtual goldmines when it comes to uncovering the obscure and rarely seen.  A while back I ran a piece aboutDon Heck, in which Don made this statement, “I did the first Iron Man story.  They have it listed that Jack Kirby did the breakdowns, but that's not true. I did it all. They just didn't bother to call me up and find out when they wrote up the credits. It doesn't really matter. Jack Kirby created the costume, and he did the cover for the issue.”  At the time there were a few comments questioning the veracity of Don’s statement, with more than one person attributing the Kirby credit to an overzealous art spotter and not Jack Kirby himself.  As you’ll see from this interview, conducted in 1975 and, in the words of co-author Steve Sherman, “…garnered from conversations Mark Evanier and I had with him when we were planning a companion volume to the King Kirby Portfolio,” Kirby himself was the source of the Iron Man credit.  Further to that, Kirby also claimed to have provided lay-outs for Bill Everett to work from for the first issue of Daredevil.  So which person was right?  Don Heck, who was adamant that he drew the first Iron Man story with no Kirby involvement, or Jack Kirby, who insisted that he provided the plot and layouts?

My guess is that both men were right.  It wasn't unusual for Kirby to provide the roughest of layouts for artists back in the early 1960s at Marvel and it could be entirely possible that he did do some quick layouts.  In the same vein, it’s also very possible that Don Heck created his own, stand alone, pencil and ink art, and as such did not work over Kirby’s layouts, mainly because they would have been the barest of roughs.  Mike Esposito pencilled the Hulk over Kirby layouts in 1965, and he recounted the experience nearly forty years later.  “He did breakdowns for me for the Hulk when I used to pencil it back in 1965,” said Mike. “Stan Lee wanted me to do it and I said, ‘I don’t know Kirby’s technique’.  He said ‘Look, we’ll pay you as a penciller’, because it was a scribble layout.  Very, very rough.  No features at all on the faces.”  This approach was against how Mike had been taught to draw, and the difference was jarring, “”I started to draw the way I was taught to draw,” continued Mike, “Stan said, ‘That’s not Kirby.  You’ve got a real nose there.  You’ve got to put two holes in the face,’ because Kirby never really drew a nose, he always just had two holes.”  Eventually Mike found his feet in drawing the Hulk, but with the advent of more, talented, pencillers, Mike was more than content to go back to his one true love, inking.

In summary, this interview, done around ten years after the event, stands as being compelling.  Kirby was, at the time, becoming bitter with Marvel, but his memories would still have been fresh and not prejudiced as they became over time.  It’s an interesting snippet into the world of Jack Kirby, mid ‘70s style.

Q:  What is it that would compel a man, such as yourself to stay up all hours of the night, pencilling comic books?
JK:  Probably something in my psychic make-up! I decided to do comics because I liked comics. I developed a deep interest in them at a rather early age and ventured to answer an ad which publicized a cartoon correspondence course. I was probably twelve or thirteen at the time. What makes me stay up all night? Probably because I want to make a living!
Q:  You're asked constantly where you get your ideas from. Any clues?
JK:  An idea can come from anywhere. The process of creation has no standards. You either think it out by yourself or talk it out with someone else or with a group...but eventually you come out with something. Ideas are everywhere. The guy in the shipping room might come up with something and what he has to say might be quite valid. The fellow in charge has to have an editorial sense. In other words, he must recognize the saleability of an idea. And, while anybody may have an idea, it is the person with the editorial capability who will recognize its relevance to the particular situation at hand. Black Magic came about because we saw a trend emerging in comics back in the fifties; something begun by others but which we had to pick up on if we didn't want to get left behind. It wasn't a new idea to use all those ghosts and spooks, but it was a saleable idea at the time and we were fortunate to get involved in it early. We had to compete with E.C., so it was tough.
Q:  At that time, you and Joe Simon were editing, writing and drawing for the Crestwood people. And you had quite a staff under you - some men who could rival or even surpass the crew at E.C. Editorially, were you trying to do things differently?
JK:  E.C. was very basic in their approach to horror. By that I mean, they left nothing to the imagination; same with most of the other horror producers. That may have been part of their downfall. You can only throw that kind of thing at the public so long before they develop immunity to it. I think we were a little more restrained with our stories, but that may be because we were putting out a lot of romance comics and it mellowed us somewhat.
Q:  The material you did for Crestwood was, more or less, superior to what you were producing just before and after your employment there. Was this due mainly to your having editorial control?
JK:  Yes - in Crestwood, we had complete control of editorial policy, of writing, of artwork. We set our own standards and Joe and I just about had complete say over our material. We tried everything! We were getting into satirical strips for the first time. I tried to do a satirical super-hero with Jack Oleck's Fighting American in order to get something new and, hopefully, get some response from a declining readership. They did as well as any books of their time. It sounds like I might be finding excuses, but the field was in very bad straits at that time. Not only did publishers have internal pressures, but they also had external pressures. One day a guy might buy a new car, and the next day find the publisher cleaning out the offices. They were in a shaky frame of mind. Only the publishers with outside sources of revenue had any confidence at all.
Q:  You had a fine staff, though -
JK:  Extremely talented! Some of the best men the field has ever seen were part of our staff. It was a wonderful time to work in the field - if you neglect the financial problems. I wouldn't class the fifties as the greatest period in comics - it was, to be frank, a really ugly period. Ugly clothes, cars, people. But it was a time when the most productive people in comics were still in the field. Marvin Stein was with us - He was a first-rate man and one of the best artists we had. Mort Meskin was at his height. Steve Ditko was blossoming out and doing fine work. There were still writers and artists around...Good ones. It was certainly akin to working in a sort of Renaissance period.
Q:  Were people trying to break into the field at that time?
JK:  Well, I think many more were trying to get out (laughs). But, yes, we had guys coming up who wanted to break in. People like Jules Feiffer, Roy Lichtenstein. If their stuff looked good, we'd give them a script. More than once, we'd give a guy a script and never see him again.
Q:  As the fifties drew to a close, the super-heroes began to return. When you began the Challengers of the Unknown, were you striving more for a super-hero rebirth or for breaking into science fiction and adventure material more?
JK:  The issues I did were still formative and I can't answer for what DC did with them. But they were heading for the super-hero image when I left. In many ways, they were the predecessors of the FF.
Q:  At this time, you also started again at Marvel.
JK:  Right. I was given monsters, so I did them. I would much rather have been drawing Rawhide Kid. But I did the monsters...we had Grottu and Kurrgo and It...it was a challenge to try to do something - anything with such ridiculous characters. But these were, in a way, the forefathers of the Marvel super-heroes. We had a Thing, we had a Hulk...and we tried to do them in a more exciting way.
Q:  About your drawing. At your fastest, during that time, do you have any idea how many books you were doing?
JK:  I felt, for a while, like I was doing them all. The stuff I wasn't pencilling, I was doing lay-outs on. I got the books going - I think that was mainly my function - so that, as Marvel acquired a top-notch staff, they could keep them going. You should remember that prior to this the entire staff consisted of Stan Lee, Sol (Brodsky) and Artie (Simek). Artie was in the most secure position, because no matter what, the books had to be lettered. Anyway, I laid out the first Iron Man and plotted it and Don Heck finished it up. Same with Daredevil - Bill Everett pencilled it over my break-downs. And I'd pass them on to other people.
Q:  Were you pencilling much faster then?
JK:  Yes - there were lots of pressures and I was struggling most of the time.  I prefer to pencil three pages on an average day or if it's a cover, about three hours.
Q:  What do you consider a good artist?
JK:  One with imagination and the ability to tell a good story. How well a man draws cuts no ice with me, if what he's trying to express comes out vague and choppy.
Q:  What about writers?
JK:  The same type of man. A guy with a fertile, active mind. The writer I respected most is now deceased. His name was Eddie Herron. He created the original Captain Marvel and was responsible for numerous stories which I considered top rate. He also fathered the Red Skull.
Q:  Was it easier to write the stories back then?
JK:  Well, maybe not easier in terms of the time required. In simplicity, yes. By that I mean World War II lent itself to good dramas. The whole thing could have been written by some hack out at Warner Brothers. It was a black and white issue with a villain who was so completely evil that it was just made to order. Anything you did in World War II was an act of nobility. If you hung Hitler or killed hundreds of Germans, you were on the side of the Angels. I once got a letter from a Nazi who told me to pick out any lamppost I wanted on Times Square because, when Hitler arrived, they'd hang me from it. It was typical of a genre of fans who have long since died out.
Q:  You enjoy reading the mail, don't you?
JK:  Yes, I love it. I think that's because I love the fans - even if some of them are Nazis. But when we were doing those romance comics at Crestwood, you should have seen the mail we got. There was some lady who wanted me to adopt her daughter because she could tell from my stories that I was a good man!
Q:  Why was it always Simon and Kirby?
Q:  Simon was bigger! He was also the letterer, most of the time. With a parlay like that, I didn't have a chance. He's also older than me - like a big brother. He was great at lay-outs. One of the few true professionals this field has seen. He still is.
Q:  So why did he give up comics and get into magazines?
JK:  He was discouraged. A lot of guys were and Joe wasn't the first guy to try for bigger things. When Crestwood went under, it was typical of a lot of bad breaks we all had to put up with. A lot of guys got out of comics for one reason or another...C.C. Beck, Eisner, Kurtzman...People of importance to comics left. I suppose I'm considered some sort of a dinosaur in the field, but I'm sticking with comics. I feel it's an important and powerful medium. I feel it's been belaboured by people who have an axe to grind - it's been down and it should be lifted to a point where it really proves its national importance. This is a visual age and comics are a visual medium. Not only can the intellectuals grasp it, but also the common man. And, despite what a lot of people may say, it's the common men who make history.

9 comments:

Mark Luebker said...

Some interesting stuff here.

First of all we have yet another example of a "truth" that Kirby zealots have tried to advance--that Kirby did breakdowns for the first Iron Man story--being vociferously disputed by the guy who actually drew it.

No offense Daniel, but when Don Heck says "They have it listed that Jack Kirby did the breakdowns, but that's not true... I did it all," I gotta believe Heck that there were no breakdowns. Unlike Kirby, he has no history of misremembering or claiming others' work.

Another surprise is Kirby referencing "Jack Oleck's Fighting American," when again, the Kirby Krowd has long insisted that was Jack's clever satire.

Of course Kirby also got the creator of Captain Marvel wrong--crediting his pal Eddie Herron when everyone knows that was Bill Parker and C.C. Beck--so Kirby's advocates can shrug all of this off as yet another example of Kirby's "poor memory."

Finally, Kirby makes it clear that the adulation of fans is what was truly important to him, so it's no wonder he had such problems with Stan Lee becoming the face of Marvel Comics.

Kirby loved his fans as long as they loved him, even if they were Nazis--while Stan Lee, the guy who gave him a chance when no one else in the industry would do so--remained the object of his scorn.

Kid said...

Have to agree with Mark above, Don. Kirby never seems to have had a great memory, even when he was younger. He claimed he designed Spider-Man's costume - wrong. He claimed to have created Superman - wrong. (Marc Evanier claims Jack never meant to, but it's what came out of his mouth.) He clearly did the pencils for the Daredevil figure on the cover and splash page of the first issue, but his style is nowhere else in evidence in the strip - at least, not indisputably so. He even claims to have created the Punisher (not the Galactus one - the one with the skull on his chest) - wrong.

Love him as we do, he just wasn't a reliable source of information. During the '70s, whenever he wrote about his involvement with Captain America, he usually (if not always) neglected to mention Joe Simon.

Contrary to diehard opinion, he didn't do everything by himself.

mr ed said...

The thing to consider with the first Iron Man story is it's an origin story nearly identical to an origin story Kirby created for the Green Arrow. The Green Arrow story is called THE WAR TAT NEVER ENDED and can be found in the recent DC OMNIBUS collection of Kirby's '50s work for DC.

inkdestroyedmybrush said...

part of the problem with that first iron man story is right there in the splash page image. Its so damn static that it scream Don Heck, who simply was good at drawing different things than Jack was. I buy the Heck story. always have.

inkdestroyedmybrush said...

part of the problem with that first iron man story is right there in the splash page image. Its so damn static that it scream Don Heck, who simply was good at drawing different things than Jack was. I buy the Heck story. always have.

Bill said...

Damn - feel like Robbing parts of this for my Kirby blog!
http://dailykirby.blogspot.com/

Ferran Delgado said...

I just took another look at TOS #39 and #40 (with Jack fully credited) and I can't see Jack's work anywhere inside of TOS #39. It's completely different than TOS #40.

I can understand perfectly Kirby's bitterness with Stan getting all the credit and fame and money, but it was a huge mistake to adopt his same attitude, specially when he asked for credit on work done by other fellow creators like Ditko or Heck.

I think that it's very important to give credibility on Jack's words depending on the age, and around 1975 he already had the "I did everything" attitude to thwart Lee's.

Nick Caputo said...

Kirby did so much work in that early Marvel period that it was probably little more than a blur to him, and while he likely remembered plotting and laying out stories for artists like Heck and Everett, that occured a year or two later, on the Avengers and the Hulk.

Since Kirby was initally involved with the Iron-Man concept, and Everett said Kirby helped him out on DD, although he didn't recall the exact details, it may be that Kirby had some input on both initial strips, however the published comics appear to be mainly drawn and laid out by Heck and Everett.

Michael Hill said...

Very sad to read all the comments about Jacob the Liar. Stan gets the benefit of the doubt when he's lying through his teeth, but Jack? Never, not even when his interpretation turns out to be nearer the truth. This post was answered on the Kirby Museum Facebook page, and look here for Mark Evanier's description of the events:

http://www.povonline.com/jackfaq/JackFaq4.htm